Dissatisfied bidders and
offerors can currently file protests for free electronically, but the General
Accountability Office (GAO) is now proposing a $350 fee. The reasons given for
the change are to finance the program, including a new system, and seemingly to
discourage what the GAO’s considers unnecessary filings that result from the
current free and easy to use system.
2,639 protests were
filed last year, and the GAO argues many of them unnecessary. Critics of the
proposal note that the current system allows access regardless of financial
circumstances, and that charging a fee will discourage protests. While the U.S.
Court of Federal Claims charges a fee for protests, it has a program in place
that considers ability to pay when collecting its filing fee; and it is unknown
whether the GAO will do the same.
The GAO determined the
proposed fee level, in part, by figuring the price of building and running a
new filing system called the Electronic Protest Docket System (EPDS). Separate
from the proposed filing fee there are additional concerns that EPDS will be
publicly available, meaning every document filed in the system could be
accessed by the general public. This would require contractors and attorneys to
redact a greater amount of material, further increasing filing costs and
affecting filing strategies. GAO has not yet addressed the EPDS confidentiality
concerns.
Copy of the April 16,
2016 proposed rule is available at the following Federal Register website:
The new rule is not
officially subject to a comment period, but the GAO is accepting comments to
the proposed through May 16, 2016.
The reasons given for the change are to finance the program, including a new system, and seemingly to discourage what the GAO’s considers unnecessary filings that result from the current free and easy to use system.E-Filing Protestsvery good stuff, appreciate it.
ReplyDeleteThis would require contractors and attorneys to redact a greater amount of material, further increasing filing costs and affecting filing strategies. GAO has not yet addressed the EPDS confidentiality concerns.GAO ProposingI hope it reaches your targetted audience. all the best thank you.Enjoyed looking at this.
ReplyDeleteThis would require contractors and attorneys to redact a greater amount of material, further increasing filing costs and affecting filing strategies. GAO has not yet addressed the EPDS confidentiality concerns.News and NotesI just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.
ReplyDeleteUtterly pent content material , thanks for information .
Critics of the proposal note that the current system allows access regardless of financial circumstances, and that charging a fee will discourage protests.Virginia Construction Law after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!Pretty nice post.
ReplyDelete